Boylan Blog

Month

May 2013

18 posts

Greetings

image

 

image

Greetings and Salutations Fellow English Major Rockstars,

As we kick back and wonder about this strange summer-winter weather that seems to defy all logic,we here at the English Majors’ Counseling Office would like to officially bid you all the fondest of farewells and happiest end to the Spring semester (finals and all) for what has been another high octane ride. We hope that you’ve all enjoyed the plenteous offerings that Spring 2013 has afforded us,  are all caught up on the third season of A Game of Thrones, finished those choice books, and are anxiously anticipating the sixth season of True Blood. But seriously folks, it’s time to pull on those hand-stitched bell bottoms and dive head first (or feet first, which ever floats your gnarly boats) into all of the fantastic articles written for the final blog post of this semester.

 Before you read this week’s selection of awesomeness, a few announcements:

1.        The Junction Function will be he;d this Thursday (May 16th) from 6:30-9:30 in the State Lounge, SUBO. All are welcomed. Fancy dress optional.

2.        We’d like you all to give us a hand in bidding a fond farewell to our veteran interns Kate, Joey, Thomas, Keith, and Sarah-Meira as they leave for pastures anew—- so stop by the office (3416B) to spread the lurve.

3.        Finally, we’d like to extend our warmest congratulations to the numerous winners during the English Majors’ Tea Party.

And before we sign off, a few words of wisdom: balance out your extraneous amounts of coffee with fruit, never take candy from strangers,watch videos of fennec foxes playing, and as always, stay golden.

 

Vibes,

Sarah Gonsalves.

The English Majors’ Counseling Office.

 

Image Source: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/—UOgyPpdbVU/TgYd1mOJh-I/AAAAAAAAAUs/8L037QmwbPM/s1600/WEC.jpg

May 13, 2013
#greetings #sarah gonsalves #looney tunes #roadrunner and wile e coyote #The Junction Function #The 2013 Junction #The English Majors' Counseling Office
Currently Watching

image

Face Off

 I am of the opinion that, by and large, reality TV is the worst thing to happen to American television since The Twilight Zone was taken off the air. Syfy channel’s hit series Face Off is now my one and only exception.  It’s not even a guilty pleasure to me––I love watching this show!

Face Off is a contest for passionate prosthetic makeup artists looking for an opportunity to take their career to the next level––and walk home with a grand prize of $100,000 and a new car. The show’s format takes its cues from such hit shows as Project Runway, but the creative twist of showing the creation of prosthetic makeup rather than high fashion suits my taste a lot better. Each week they are challenged to make functional and highly creative makeup prosthetics around a particular theme. The show is currently on its fourth season, and this time around the contestants have already had to create original goblin kings from different landscapes:

(this guy is the goblin king of the desert)

candy-themed creatures:

And…two-headed giant things:

Keep in mind that the contestants only had a total of twenty hours over the span of three days to complete all the pieces featured here. It’s heartbreaking whenever somebody’s prosthetic mold cracks and damages their piece or their color palette doesn’t turn out as expected because there’s absolutely no time for anything to go wrong.

So anyway, I don’t know why you’re still reading this and not scurrying off to find a way to make watching Face Off a part of your weekly routine, but get on it! New episodes air every Tuesday night at nine on Syfy. On top of the works of living art you see emerge through each episode you will be inspired by the passion, dedication, and verve the contestants bring to the show. Many have toiled away in obscurity for years as self-taught independent makeup artists, and some have even overcome extreme physical and emotional trauma for the opportunity to prove themselves in front of a panel of experts in the field. The show demonstrates that there is no room for arrogance or complacency in the professional world. To excel at anything you have to go forth wholeheartedly, with your passion as your guide and love as your shield. 

Josane Cumandala

Image Sources:

http://alienbee.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/face-off-logo.jpg http://cdn1.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/face-off-season-4-premiere-creatures-7.jpg

http://25.media.tumblr.com/f85ab11d31ee85651177a3715634ffc3/tumblr_mh3jc40B011qef789o1_500.png

http://i.imgur.com/UCyviIu.jpg http://hippogriff.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/521713_584428108251745_1498030702_n.jpg

May 13, 2013
Currently Listening

image

 

Music in Sonic the Hedgehog

image

Music has always been a special, yet underrated, aspect to the Sonic the Hedgehog series. It’s not Guitar Hero. It’s also notParapa the Rappa. What it is, however, is a game that is characterized by speed, rhythm, and flow. Music and Sonic the Hedgehog seem to be a natural fit. Anyone familiar with the games knows the controls and end goals are really simple. The object is to collect as many golden rings as you can while completing the level in as short a time as possible. Here is a video for those never before exposed to the blue hedgehog.

 

You push forward through entire levels, jumping periodically to avoid obstacles. Due to the simplicity of the game, there needs to be something else. Something that keeps the player engrossed in the experience besides just playing. This is where the music comes in. In most mediums the music is there to heighten the experience. The music can also place a scene in context, but in the video game medium it enhances whatever the player is doing. This is no different in Sonic the Hedgehog. Below are some of my favorites.    

Note: All these tracks are from the Sonic Generations video game (the game which celebrates Sonic’s 20th anniversary). Which means most of the popular tracks in the franchise’s history can be located there. I decided to go with the modern remakes of the tracks because I thought they sounded better. Not to say there is anything wrong with the classic 16 bit tracks. It’s all a matter of opinion. 

 

Green Hill Zone is a classic level in the Sonic the Hedgehog series. More times than not, when you first start a Sonic game this is where you will begin. Not only is it a seminal level in video game history, but the music is very catchy. 

This is one of my personal favorites. I want this to be my theme song. This song must be played once I cross the threshold into any room.

I’ve never played Sonic Unleashed, but I might just for this track (or maybe not). 

This has a very uplifting, friendship always wins, feel too it. No need to worry people, Sonic is running faster than the speed of sound to save the day!!!!

 

This was a track from Sonic Heroes. I remember playing the game on the Gamecube years ago. I never noticed at the time how good it was, but now I can’t get enough of listening to it. Maybe it’s the Nostalgia? 

-Shayne McGregor

May 13, 2013
Illuminations

Do you ever wonder about the people in the painting? I do. I wonder about their lives, their dreams, and what happened to them after they were forever immortalized by their artist.

In the entire history of art, one of the most intriguing players, in my opinion, is poet, model, and eventual artist, Elizabeth Siddal. Lizzie, as she was known, was portrayed in many Pre-Raphaelite works of the mid-nineteenth century and became one of the most important models of this movement’s early years. She emerged from modest origins, as just a girl working in a millinery shop. It was here, that she was discovered in 1849 by the artist, Walter Deverell, who studied under Dante Gabriel Rossetti, one of the three founders of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood.

The Pre-Raphaelites rebelled against the romantic landscape paintings of British Art, and were attracted to works created centuries prior, by Italian masters such as Raphael. Most of their inspiration drew upon Romantic Poetry, Shakespeare, and the Bible. In technique too, they also rebelled against the methods of the day, leaving their canvasses white rather than coating them in black before painting. As a result, their paintings have a certain bright and glowing quality.

During her modeling career, Lizzie became romantically involved with Rossetti, and they lived together for many years before they married in 1860. During this time, he taught her to paint, and she produced several works under his tutelage. 

The two had a bizarre relationship. Although Rossetti slept with many of his models and even fell in love with another while still living with Lizzie, he grew possessive and would not let any other artist paint her. One of her last modeling jobs with another artist, was posing as a drowning Ophelia for John Everett Millais, during which she contracted a severe cold from the freezing water and never recovered.

It is said that he delayed in marrying her, because she was of a lowly birth and social class, and it would not have been acceptable. It is ironic, how these artists who rebel and claim to be so critical of society and its rules, are still, themselves, made prisoners.

By the time of their eventual marriage, Lizzie was a broken woman. She had for many years lived in the fear of being abandoned, and her tarnished reputation from her relationship with Rossetti made it impossible for her to be suitably married to anyone else. She suffered from depression and became addicted to Laudanum, a popular opiate of the time.

This addiction worsened following the stillbirth of her daughter in 1861. A year later Lizzie was pregnant again, and afraid of losing this child as well. She knew her husband was in love with another woman and sank even deeper into her depression. Some say it was an accident. And some say she wanted to do it, and her husband found the note she had left for him before she killed herself by overdosing. We will never know the truth.

In one of her poems, Lizzie describes her long decline into the torturous love that destroyed her:
“For I am but a startled thing
Nor can I ever be
Aught save a bird whose broken wing
Must fly away from thee.
I cannot give to thee the love
I gave so long ago,
The love that turned and struck me down
Amid the blinding snow.
I can but give a failing heart
And weary eyes of pain,
A faded mouth that cannot smile
And may not laugh again.
Yet keep thine arms around me, love,
Until I fall to sleep;
Then leave me, saying no goodbye
Lest I may wake, and weep.”

—Ariella Shapiro

Paintings:

“Ophelia” John Everett Millais. Source: alamodealamort.blogspot.com

“Clerk Saunders” Elizabeth Siddall. Source: http://fannycornforth.blogspot.com

“Beata Beatrix” Dante Gabriel Rossetti. Source: preraph.org

Poem:

“Worn Out” Elizabeth Siddal. Source: http://lizziesiddal.com/portal/worn-out/

Article Source: “Lizzie Siddal: Face of the Pre-Raphaelites” by Lucinda Hawksley.

             

 

May 13, 2013
Poem of the Week

image

Man’s Country

image


How dare you be fair before 11am
pit bull and stubble snow
white among thugs with teardrop tattoos
you passed, adjacent trains
on the sidewalk
look just long enough to
wrap me in my winter coat
readjust my girl jeans
just for you, this morning I picked
the pair you like, the flannel you
find most flattering
I met you and then
you went to work


If we were real lesbians
we‘d be the prettiest lesbians here.
Tomorrow I’m gonna
try looking cute and sell
myself to a very old man


I am made to peck at your torso
someone has to appreciate
the rippling meat, two hardened
sacs stretched tight and milky
white ruffle feathers greasy
blonde scruff your
military haircut. Kiss
each bicep because
lord knows, she won’t do it


—Joey D

May 13, 2013
Culture Corner

image

The Real Deal

Sometimes I feel like our culture values and rewards the wrong things. And I’m not even talking about the Kim Kardashians, Paris Hiltons, and other professional famous people who take up half our news cycle with their nothing and have a bazillion followers on Twitter.

I’m talking about our culture of academics and the way it prizes and rewards certain things above others.

I’m talking about the over-valuation of people like me.

*

The gray-haired lady sitting next to me on the subway thumbs through a veritable deck of dirty metrocards. At her feet lie two large, sturdy paper bags stuffed to the point of bursting with empty bottles and soda cans, clearly for exchange purposes. Her tweed blazer is faded and fraying and doesn’t match her patterned shirt.

I watch her shuffle through the deck a few times, then decide to speak up, because a) if I don’t ask what she’s planning to do with all those metrocards, I’m gonna wonder about it forever, and b) several of my fiction works involve homeless characters and I don’t like to pass up an opportunity to learn more, and she doesn’t even smell bad.

“What are you going to do with those?”

She looks up, not at all offended by the question. “I use them.” Her words are faintly accented but I suck at accents that aren’t British, Australian, or South African, so I can’t tell what it is. Not white-bread American, that’s all I can say for sure.

“They have money on them?”

“Yes, ten cents, twenty cents.” She points to a couple of the cards in turn. “People throw them out. I use them. I don’t pay for trains.”

“Yeah, why pay if you don’t have to?”

She smiles at me and leans over a little with a conspiratorial whisper, “People tease me about these.” A gesture at the bags. “They say I look like homeless person, but I don’t care. This is three dollars.”

I swallow my guilt over the fact that this conversation probably wouldn’t be happening if I hadn’t made that very assumption. Slick, SM. Check your middle-class white girl prejudices at the door next time, why don’cha? “Yeah, who cares? Money is money. When my brother and I were kids, we had this whole thing where we were gonna collect all the soda bottles and get money for them. But it was too much work and we were too lazy to follow through.”

“This is my exercise,” she laughs. “I tell myself, other people go to gym; I collect these things. Too busy for gym.”

“Do you have a job?” I ask, hoping that’s not too rude.

“I work,” she replies amiably. “I am secretary.”

“Cool. I don’t work; I still live with my parents.”

“Secretary is good job, if you need one,” she says helpfully. “And cashier at grocery store.”

“Yeah, I’m not sure they’re hiring by me, though.”

“What do your parents do?” she asks.

“My parents? They’re teachers.”

“Oh, you rich!” she exclaims with a smile. “You don’t need to work. You rich.”

I laugh because that is honestly the first time anyone’s ever called me rich, but in the context of this conversation, I most certainly am. “Well, I’ll have to work eventually. I don’t expect people to keep giving me stuff.”

We continue talking, about my family, her family, my classes, and random bits and bobs that float in and out of the conversation. When I draw a blank on what to say next, she chimes in with questions of her own. I’m occasionally conscious of other people in the train car watching us bemusedly, this pretty, well-dressed white girl and this homeless-looking lady conversing like old friends, and I think, “Stop staring. Why should it make a difference who talks to who? We’re all just people here.”

I forget to ask her for her name until she’s just about to get off the train. It gets lost in the platform hubbub, and then the doors slide shut behind her.

*

It’s encounters like that that make me rethink our whole system. Make me look at myself in relation to the world and the things I’ve done and question the ways I’m treated.

Because I’m on a full-ride merit-based college scholarship; I’ve got an additional outside stipend from a separate foundation; plus, I just got awarded almost $2,500 dollars to go to Hollywood over winter break to conduct research for a novel I’m working on. All that stuff is awesome, but what did I do to get it?

I put words together. Seriously, that’s pretty much it. I put words together consistently, in keeping with deadlines, over a long period of time, on a wide variety of subjects. Yay me.

Our culture claims to value intelligence, resourcefulness, perseverance, and hard work. But it doesn’t really. It doesn’t value that lady on the subway, who works herself to the bone and cuts corners and spends hours a day collecting metrocards and recyclables just to get by. It values and throws money at people like me, who do nothing substantial beyond put words on a page, who can’t drive, have never paid rent, or even bought a single roll of toilet paper for themselves.

Don’t get me wrong; plenty of college scholarship kids have their own apartments and work real jobs and take care of themselves. But I’m not one of those. Blog posts and essays like this are probably my most tangible contributions.

So now that you’ve read this, my masterpiece and true example of my value to society, I ask you: Am I worth it?

—Sarah Meira Rosenberg

Image Source: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/11/18/timestopics/metrocard_395.jpg

* * * * *

I wrote this last semester, and it’s the piece that I want to leave on the blog as we part for the summer, and as I leave Brooklyn College, because the questions are still relevant. I suspect they will always be relevant, that spectacular people will never be valued as much as they should be, and that people like me will be elevated and esteemed and respected far more than we deserve.

—SM

May 13, 20131 note
#culture corner #Sarah Meira Rosenberg #scholarships #values
illuminations

image

Marcela

image

We can assume, since Kirchner was considered to be a seductive, virile man, that the relationship with his fifteen-year-old model Marcela was more than just platonic.  She lies on the couch in a rhythmic curve, clad in a tiger striped swimsuit that glows by virtue of the emerald couch and wintergreen walls. Her physical beauty is apparent, almost incandescent, yet her psychic state of being seems languorous, introverted and oblique. The indiscriminate sense of sedation is supported by the sleeping cat in the foreground, and by the empty bottles in the back that once, perhaps a few hours past, brimmed with lilac.

Marcela’s state of withdrawal (whether it suggests satisfaction or sorrow) is seen from a unique, aerial-diagonal perspective, making the distance between the model and the viewer both spatial and existential. But aside from its philosophical undertones, the painting touches, ultimately, upon the laws of attraction: is the concupiscence we feel for Marcela kindled simply by her beauty, or is it because she is looking—despite our craving for her attention—away?

—Tom Salvanti

Article Source: Lorenz, Ulrike, and Norbert Wolf. Brücke. Köln: Taschen, 2008. Print.

Image Source: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4118/4755814482_d39512773a_b.jpg

May 13, 20133 notes
#tom salvanti #illuminations #ernst ludwig kirchner #die brücke #marcela #expressionism #summer 2013
Currently Eating

image

Homemade Ice Cream

image

When I first bought my girlfriend a one-gallon ice cream maker for Christmas 2009, I assumed we would immediately start churning out Ben & Jerry’s quality creations and that, within a few months, we would end up saving more money than the machine had cost. We quickly discovered that I was way off the mark on both counts.

The little packet of included recipes had both quick and elaborate options, and we naturally opted to test the simplest of them first—a quick vanilla that only called for us to throw together some milk, sugar, vanilla extract, a touch of lemon juice, and a hefty helping of heavy cream. This last ingredient can be pretty pricey and—even if your local grocery is generous enough to offer quarts of the stuff, instead of charging you for an armload of little pints—a gallon of homemade ice cream ends up being more or less equivalent with the cost of a high-end brand. Add to that the hassle of storing, in a tiny New York kitchen, the one gallon canister, the four gallon outer bucket (for ice and rock salt), and the motor that spends an hour loudly churning, and you quickly arrive at the conclusion that the final product had better be amazing. So you open the canister expecting new dimensions of gustatory delight—like the first time you tasted fresh-baked bread. Instead you find a batch of medicore soft-serve that will harden overnight into an icy brick, every bite of which will leave a film on the roof of your mouth and never taste quite as rich as you’d expect.

It turns out that Ben and Jerry really know what they’re doing. That to make a gallon of anything nearly as good as their pun-driven pints requires the heart-clogging addition of a whole carton’s worth of egg yolks that will need to be cooked a day in advance so the resulting custard can chill overnight before churning. It turns out that homemade ice cream is an expensive and inconvenient pain in the ass.

So why, after nearly four years, do we keep this machine around and continue to put it to work every couple months? For a start, the addition of those egg yolks actually makes a huge difference, and you end up with something smooth, creamy, and delicious. There is also the novelty of inviting friends over for homemade ice cream, or of surprising someone with a hand-crafted ice cream cake on her birthday. But most of all there’s the challenge of working with your limitations—tweaking a recipe, trying something no one else has made before, watching the custard like a hawk so the yolks don’t harden, and making the whole thing just a little too sweet because you’ve learned that it won’t taste as strong once it’s frozen. Then you seal it up to churn and wait to see what comes out when the machine stops humming.

My latest and greatest achievement is a honey, bourbon, and cinnamon ice cream that pairs perfectly with a brownie and some spicy chocolate ganache, but whatever you put in is guaranteed to taste better for the effort you’ve expended.

— Keith Baldwin

Image source: http://media.tumblr.com/143244a6aa42ab745f80ba33c731343f/tumblr_inline_mlznutFXM21qz4rgp.jpg

May 13, 20131 note
#Currently Eating #Keith Baldwin #Ice Cream
Culture Corner: Guest Edition

image

Allen Ginsberg’s Contribution to Brooklyn College

image


“Follow your inner moonlight; don’t hide the madness.” -Allen Ginsberg

Poet. Political Activist. Professor.

A true renaissance man, Allen Ginsberg was a cultural rebel who simply personified greatness. He was truly the jack-of-all-trades and his innumerable accomplishments and triumphs are justifiably well-documented, but perhaps his least glorified achievement was his tenure as a Distinguished Professor of English at Brooklyn College from 1986 until his passing in 1997.

Although teaching at Brooklyn College may seem like a plateau after his sumptuous and action-packed life, Ginsberg’s eccentric personality ensured otherwise. He quickly became one of the most important faculty members of Brooklyn College. His presence as a world-renowned poet coupled with his immense knowledge of the English language created a synergy that was unmatched on campus.

Roni Natov, another distinguished professor at Brooklyn College, described Ginsberg as “quirky, idiosyncratic, bold and utterly unconventional.” She portrays him as a refreshing energy in Brooklyn College as she fondly remembered when he unexpectedly interrupted the Star Spangled Banner during the commencement ceremony one year by blurting out, “THE HOME OF THE SLAVE,” instead of, “the home of the brave.” As fellow faculty members and students gasped in horror, Ginsberg nonchalantly responded, “Well, it’s true!” He personified actions speak louder than words by just doing what he wanted and doing what he believed in. For instance, Ginsberg’s outspoken comments on NAMBLA (The North American Man/Boy Love Association) incited protests from several Brooklyn College alumni. Also, he wrote and published two poems, “Brooklyn College Brain” and “Brooklyn College Assignments” about the life at the college. Undoubtedly, he brought some notoriety to Brooklyn College, spicing things up a bit.

Allen Ginsberg’s presence alone automatically made Brooklyn College a more attractive academic environment for prospective students. Robert Booras, a graduate of the college’s MFA program, explained how “students from all over the country applied to Brooklyn College for the chance to study with him,” and “many other [students] were in the program primarily because of [him].” Booras further expressed how the versatile professor “elevated and contemporized Brooklyn College’s MFA program and its reputation.” His very presence was so significant that “the program is still benefitting from his contributions as well as the fame and poetic integrity he brought to the college.”

Ginsberg was renowned for political crusades that challenged sexual suppression and economic materialism, but his personal activism at Brooklyn College is rarely mentioned. Professor Natov said Ginsberg was “great to have politically on campus” because his staunch pro-union agenda provided a respected voice for the voiceless. Furthermore, he frequently guest lectured classes and openly interacted with students. He was frank and honest about his personal life with his students and readers, and this elevated his authority as a professor and poet. Robert Booras described how “figuratively, and sometimes literally, [Ginsberg] stood naked before you; he didn’t hide behind any masks,” and because of that “if you were in a room with him, he held your attention.” When you were “reading a poem of his, you easily empathized with him, as he took on hypocrisy and injustice, or sung a love poem.”

Additionally, Ginsberg exercised his power and fame for the greater good of Brooklyn College by allowing students and faculty to meet well-known poets and authors. He often brought famous writer friends in for readings or lectures, including Jamaica Kincaid, Jayne Cortez, Michael Harper, and Quincy Troupe. As a professor, Ginsberg radiated energy and passion, and as Booras explained, he “consistently put forth his poetics of first thought is best thought, and how the line should be defined by breath and rhythm.” Moreover, he was able to diversify the core English curriculum with the addition of several innovative courses, including the seminar class “African American Poetic Genius: Ma Rainey to Gwendolyn Brooks,” which he taught. Furthermore, Professor William Gargan of the college explained “unlike many of the Distinguished Professors, Allen was generally on campus more than once a week. In addition to his classes, he participated in many of the programs for the Wolfe Institute, took part in programs sponsored by IRP [the Institute for Retired Professionals], and regularly attended faculty meetings.”

Allen Ginsberg was truly an asset to Brooklyn College, and his everlasting impression is a constant reminder of the loss of a respected man that broke all traditional barriers. Professor Robert Viscusi said it best in a interview with Poets Path: “one could not spend an hour in his presence and not come away wishing oneself a better person, a more attentive teacher, a more devoted citizen of the republic of letters.” As suggested by Bill Morgan, a Ginsberg scholar, Allen Ginsberg’s tenure at Brooklyn College indicated his “increasing interest in consolidating and passing on his legacy,” as he transformed his focus onto education, a vehicle for distributing the treasure of his mind.

—Gurasees Chawla

 

Image source: The library of Roni Natov

May 13, 20134 notes
#Gurasees Chawla #Allen Ginsberg #brooklyn college
Greetings

image

 

 

image

Yup, it’s that time of year again, the time when everything’s coming at you all at once, much like a Yu Darvish curveball, fastball, changeup, and slider merged into one image. Exams, final papers, capstone projects, registration, summer jobs, graduation  — it’s enough to drive anyone into a corner to rock in the fetal position. In fact, we’re rocking in the fetal position as we type this. (We are very talented typists.)

 —   If you need help with your registration needs, or need a respite from the insanity and just want to see a friendly face, please stop by 3416 Boylan, and we will do our very best to make this stressful experience bearable.

 —   And come chill out with us at the English Majors Tea at 12:30 on Thursday, May 9, in the Gold Room in SUBO! Copies of the Junction literary journal will be hot off the presses!

 

 Hugs to all,

Sarah Meira Rosenberg and the rest of the talented typists in the English Majors’ Counseling Office

 

Image source: screencap of this gif - http://nbchardballtalk.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/darvish-gif.gif?w=450&h=356

May 6, 2013
#greetings #Sarah Meira Rosenberg #baseball
News Briefs

image

She’s Still the Man I Married

 

I do not know why, but yahoo news always has the most unremarkable and, sometimes, the most absurd, news stories featured on its homepage. Most of the time I just ignore them because honestly how are the Kardashians even considered news? But occasionally, something thought provoking slips into the news stream and makes me pause a moment before performing the morning’s routine email perusal.

Twenty-five years ago, literature professor, Jim Boylan, married his wife Deedie, and in the years that followed, the couple had two sons. Ten years into their marriage, Jim began expressing his desires to be a woman. It began with cross-dressing, something he had done when he was young and single, but had concealed from those who knew him. Now, he was married and had a family to consider. Remarkably, his wife was supportive, allowing him to engage these behaviors as long as it was done in private. 

It was a challenging period for both of them, culminating in Jim’s eventual surgery and final arrival to the world of womanhood. She was no longer Jim Boylan, husband, and father, now she was Jennifer Boylan, wife, and mother. Although they live chastely, they are still married, and I was overwhelmed not only by their own personal strength, but also by the strength of their relationship. As Deedie describes in an interview with Oprah, “We’re married, but we’re in a celibate marriage, but we’re monogamous. We’re committed to each other. What we’ve lost is the physical intimacy, but we still rely on each other, we’re still a team, we still have a family and a life that we share.” 

I find it comforting and inspiring that in a world where many relationships and marriages have explosively dissolved over things less spectacular than a gender change, that this couple is dedicated to continuing their life together. “He’s not the man I married,” is a common refrain in marital counseling, and in this case, it is actually true. Perhaps we could all learn a lesson in unconditional love from this brave couple, because in the end she still is the same person.

What would the world be like if we all loved someone that much? 

—Ariella Shapiro

Article Source: http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/transgender-author-jennifer-finney-boylan-went-from-dad-to-mom—how-it-changed-her-family-162811616.html?.tsrc=vmus

Image Source: http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/PgZzpyZt8hnYZTFgKKQ47A—/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTUwMA—/http://l.yimg.com/os/publish-images/lifestyles/2013-05-03/2b704ed4-88ba-43c8-8d8d-82276a0ec84c_photo-2-for-part-3-in-bw.jpg

 

 


Two Brooklyn College Veterans Sign up for Service Again

 

image

A Mission Continues Fellow pays his respects after taking an oath to serve his country again. 

At the 9/ll Memorial, I stood with Selena Coppa, both of us Brooklyn College students and veterans, where we took an oath to serve our country for a second time along with over 70 other veterans. After the oath, we were pinned and inducted into Bravo Class 2013 of the Mission Continues Fellowship.

The Mission Continues (TMC), a non-profit organization, challenges veterans to give back to their communities via a selective fellowship it grants to veterans who wish to work at a charitable organization.

TMC has been making news with articles in The Huffington Post, PBS, and Time magazine, where two articles can be found,  one on Bravo Class’ orientation  over the weekend, and another on TMC’s founder, Eric Greitens, who was named in The 2013 Times 100 list of most influential people. The article cited Greitens’ work with Mother Theresa, victims of genocide, service as a Navy SEAL, and now as a leader of over 600 veterans who have made a commitment to serve their country as civilians through TMC.

Among all the major media outlets talking about TMC, John Stewart hosted Greitens on The Daily Show where Greitens’ summed up The Mission Continues best. He said, “The Mission Continues is a National Service Organization that helps Post 9/11 Veterans transition from the military to service and leadership positions here at home.”

Prior to TMC orientation I attended this weekend, most of what I knew about The Mission Continues was that they were going to fund me to work at Single Stop as a special representative for veterans. My job, which I think is awesome, is to help struggling veterans and family members find services and opportunities that enable them to move forward with their lives.

I also knew that I would begin a rigorous leadership curriculum, and I was happy about that too, but what I didn’t expect was the biggest reward, the reward I received standing next to Selena Coppa while getting pinned at the 9/11 Memorial.

The reward was the return of that old feeling, something I have been missing since I lost my job in the Navy as an Aviation Search and Rescue Swimmer (SAR), the quiet confidence that comes from a life with purpose which had once come with the old SAR motto for life, “So others may live.”

Knowing that everyone around me had the same purpose written in their hearts, had the same direction as me, that was a bit like a dream. For once, I felt like maybe this country can be fixed. It certainly felt possible standing next to people like Greitens and our own Selena Coppa. 

—Joe Wade

Image Source: http://sphotos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/p480x480/935795_10151429329923170_1107238840_n.jpg

May 6, 2013
#News Briefs #Jennifer Boylan #TRansexuality #Oprah #Ariella Shapiro #Joe Wade #The Mission Continues
Currently Reading

image

Adaptation by Malinda Lo

I try not to go into anything with expectations. Having no expectations that something will be good means you’re free to absorb whatever it is — a book, a movie, a TV show, a game — with fewer biases and are less likely to be disappointed, because hey, you never expected it to be good in the first place. 

On the other hand, sometimes I can’t help but get excited about something before I even read or see it. This book was an example of that. A 40 page preview was released a few months before it came out, and I read it and it was fantastic. Intense, fast-paced, action-packed, with dozens of questions set up to be answered in the rest of the book. So I was excited about that.

I also knew a bit about the author, Malinda Lo, who is a Chinese-American lesbian Young Adult writer who is known in the YA publishing community for being a wonderful voice on issues such as racial diversity and LGBTQ portrayals in YA literature. Adaptation was nominated for a Lambda award, plus I knew there would be at least one major LGBTQ character, and I was looking forward to seeing how Lo would balance that aspect with the action-adventure plot. I was really excited to read a book with an LGBTQ main character that wasn’t about being LGBTQ, but rather having that as just one element of the character and the story.

And well … I should have known better than to have expectations. I was unfortunately disappointed.

The opening chapters are riveting, no doubt about that. The book starts with the main character, Reese, and her high school debate partner and their coach waiting to fly home from a debate tournament, and then suddenly planes start crashing all over the country. No one knows what’s going on, all flights are grounded, people start to panic, and to top it off, all information about the plane crashes is being systematically wiped from the internet. It’s intense.

But then … things slow down. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t need nonstop action to keep me happy as a reader. But the problem is, when the action slows down, the faults in the characterization become more apparent. I really wanted to like Reese and be invested in her story, but I felt like I didn’t have a good enough handle on who she was as a person, what makes her tick outside of direct influences from the plot, and that made it difficult to empathize with her.

Perhaps this was because there was so much frantic action in the first few chapters — it’s hard to establish personality under those circumstances. But also, Lo seems to skimp on details that aren’t directly plot-relevant. For instance, Reese and her debate partner, David, just lost a huge tournament after making it to the finals. But we never once hear what the topic of the debate was. We never once hear about any topics for any debates, which presumably there have been a lot of if they made it all the way to the finals. We never see Reese use any possible knowledge she learned in her years as a debater. Research skills, methods of arguing, reasons why Reese was so driven to succeed in this particular area, specific memories relating to previous debates — none of these are demonstrated or explored. This was frustrating to me from a character perspective. I love when female characters are given passions that have nothing to do with romance (sadly all too rare), but this passion seemed sorely underdeveloped, to the detriment of the character.

And then I had issues with the romance. Not to give too much away, but toward the middle of the novel, Reese meets a girl who makes her question her sexuality, and they begin to pursue a relationship. 

As someone who has close friends who identify as bisexual or fluid and have struggled with it, I was really glad to see it represented so matter-of-factly. Unfortunately, I didn’t think highly of the romantic relationship because of the underdeveloped characterization. Romance is a great way to reveal character — you learn about what a character values, what they need, what they respond to in another person, what they connect with. Disappointingly, it seems that most of what Reese is shown to connect with in her love interest is that she’s hot, like really really hot. And flighty and adventurous in the vein of the manic pixie dreamgirl. Not much substance to the relationship at all. And I guess being able to show that hormone-driven high school relationships (cough Twilight cough) have every right to be homosexual as well as heterosexual is a good thing, but it’s not very satisfying.

So overall, I really wanted to like this book. It had a lot of good ideas and interesting elements, but the execution was lacking. There’s a sequel in the works, and I’m on the fence about whether I want to read it or not. Characterization has been known to improve over the life of a series, though, so I might give it a shot.

—-Sarah Meira Rosenberg

Image source: http://www.malindalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Lo_Adaptation_HC_600x900.jpg

May 6, 2013
#Currently Reading #Sarah Meira Rosenberg #Adaptation #Malinda Lo
Poem of the Week

image

When the Glass of My Body Broke  by Anne Sexton

Oh mother of sex,

lady of the staggering cuddle,

where do these hands come from?

A man, a Moby Dick of a man,

a swimmer going up and down in his brain,

the gentleness of wine in his fingertips,

where do these hands come from?

I was born a glass baby and nobody picked me up

except to wash the dust off me.

He has picked me up and licked me alive.

Hands

growing like ivy over me,

hands growing out of me like hair,

yet turning into fire grass,

planting an iris in my mouth,

spinning and blue,

the nipples turning into wings,

the lips turning into days that would not give birth,

days that would not hold us in their house,

days that would not wrap us in their secret lap,

and yet hands, hands growing out of pictures,

hands crawling out of the walls,

hands that excite oblivion,

like a wind,

a strange wind

from somewhere tropic

making a storm between my blind legs,

letting me lift the mask of the child from my face,

while all the toy villages fall

and I sink softly into

the heartland.

May 6, 2013
Currently Watching

image

Jericho

image

For this week’s segment I decided to search out a new show to watch on Netflix because I’ve now seen every episode of Face-Off and I need something to occupy me between weekly episodes of Game of Thrones. 

I decided to try out CBS’ short-lived cult series Jericho. The show chronicles the fate of a fictitious rural town in Kansas following the aftermath of a mysterious, nation-wide nuclear assault. After watching two episodes I have to applaud the show for its ambitious concept and taut suspense. The story does not hinge on excessive violence or shock value to drive up ratings, instead it strives to depict how real people would respond to an extraordinary situation. The show deliberately tries to play on our society’s fear of terrorism, anarchy, and the unknown.

The show’s “realism” does not always succeed however. Things always seem to work themselves out a bit too neatly if you’ve grown accustomed to the grittiness of shows like The Walking Dead. The main character Jake begins as an archetypal “prodigal son” with a shady past. The pilot episode indicates that Jake has been a complete disappointment to his family for reasons no one cares to explain, but after the attack he is always a true hero, coming to the rescue in the nick of time with no apparent concern for his own safety. Here comes Jake rescuing a bus full of children. There goes Jake saving a beautiful blonde from a pair of escaped convicts just before they manage to kill her. This is a very tame storyline so far as far as the post-apocalyptic genre goes.

I want to like this show, I really do. Even though Jake has managed to save the day every time so far, watching him do it is still exciting. There are moments of nail-biting suspense, and aside from Jake the other characters populating the town of Jericho seem far more human in that they are vulnerable, fearful, and yet sometimes still capable of the simplest kindness. The storyline overall can be a bit contrived, but I still want to know why so many people adore this show. There are even rumors that Netflix may one day give Jericho a revival.

—Josane Cumandala

May 6, 2013
Currently Listening

image

Sly and the Family Stone, If You Want Me to Stay

Scientists have spent a lot of time studying what makes the experience of music so compelling, and have come up with some interesting answers. But perhaps the only thing you can say without being controversial is that music is about what meets our expectations vs. what defies them.

It’s the reason that, whenever I visit my parents, I’m guaranteed to hear my dad singing, whistling, or humming one of the same five tunes that have been on a loop in his skull since I was a kid.

Some songs will never get old. The more we hear them, the more they cement themselves in our subconscious, so that each familiar note starts to feel like coming home. And while I’m currently in the process of scratching this song deep into my brain with endless repetition, it’s the other side of the coin I’m really after. I keep replaying it because I’m trying to recapture the thrill and surprise of the first time I heard it.

I remember the twanging, modulated bassline kicking in, and immediately knowing that I was in for some serious goddamn funk. I wasn’t disappointed. This central thread of the song is then furnished with drums, piano and trumpet, all satisfyingly funky; but what really makes this song amazing is the power of Sly Stone’s voice.

If you can ignore the hollow misogyny of lyrics like “You’ve got to get it straight, how could I ever be late, when you’re a woman taking up my time,” there is something undeniably powerful in his vocals. He transitions so smoothly between deep, bassy notes and falsetto highs—between roaring and crooning—and always with just the right touch of smoke and gravel. He toys effortlessly with the instrumentals and pronounces his esses like Bogart or Robinson. Sly Stone’s voice in this song is baddass incarnate.

The first time I listened to it I don’t think I’d ever heard anything like it. I was genuinely excited in a way that only a new experience of music can make me, and then only rarely. Now the whole track has become familiar, and lost that initial edge. I still love the song—to the point where I can’t stop listening—but every time I hit play a part of me still expects the thrill of that first listen. Oh well. If I can’t feel it, maybe one of you can. There are two versions of the song that are readily available—each with its own virtues. I recommend them both.

—Keith Baldwin

Video source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdorgC9qUkI

Image source: http://missrosen.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/murray-neitlich-sly-stone.jpg

May 6, 20132 notes
#Keith Baldwin #Sly and the Family Stone #Currently Listening #funk #music
culture corner

image

Harley the Hipster Hater           

image

Where does one draw the line between the fallacies of a prejudgment and the logic of an accurate appraisal (over another individual, that is)? Appraisal not in terms superficialities like income or status; but of immaterial assets like virtue, ability and intent. One knows well the wide claim that nobody—not even highly trained psychologists—can directly observe another person’s intrinsic worth; yet what if one’s inferences (those based on keen, thorough observations) were sharp and valid in that he could discern, despite the influence of his surroundings, the difference between an ignorant guess and an educated, rational deduction.

Experience and understanding allows one, it seems, to ascertain, within a given crowd of people, which of them have potential, which of them have intellect, which art, which virtue, which spirits, which soul; and it allows one to identify those who, despite their void of talent or relevance to society, tend not to nurture themselves or advance their place in the universe, but rather to dismiss, derogate and depreciate the accomplishments and accumulated wisdom of others who are not plagued by the same existential condition. It is the essential shortcomings, insecurities and impotencies of these types of people that connect, collect and combine them into one cultish and inane ideology widely known as hipsterism.

A hipster, according to my definition (since there is no universal consensus as to who or what a hipster really is), is an individual of high socioeconomic status who, based on his or her idle and mundane upbringing in a non-city suburb or small town, relocate to New York City (with the financial support of their parents or other relatives) to assume the role of a struggling artist, a political activist, a renegade philosopher, a radical poet, etc. But the key words in the previous sentence are assume the role of; these individuals are not artists (they have produced nothing of value; ask to see their work and hear the hoard of excuses); they are not political activists (their rallies, initiatives and arguments are tactless and wayward: Occupy Wall Street, for example, was a joke, and it was put into effect mostly by hipsters), and, lastly, they are not—and have nerve to refer to themselves as—renegades, rebels or radicals (for there is big difference between a revolutionary hero and an ostentatious spoiled idiot with Oppositional Defiant Disorder).

Hipsters, as discussed earlier, have no intellectual or artistic capacity, only loads and loads of capital (though they often try to deny it). Thus, though they lack the ambition and inspiration needed to compose works of legitimate merit (like that of Van Gogh, Picasso and Pollock, to name a few), they have the financial resources necessary to bring their amateur, ineffective ideas into fruition. They can, for instance, take a blank eight-by-ten piece of paper, scribble onto it a few visually-offensive lines, and bribe Larry Gagosian (the infamous and incredibly wealthy art dealer responsible for exploiting the careers of thousands of young talents and nontalents) to book them for a few high-end galleries in Chelsea.

There is a myriad of flagrant problems with such a deal: one, exhibiting art with no skill or substance will eventually and inevitably reduce the population’s appreciation for aesthetics (and what, among the worst potential post-apocalyptic disasters, would the world be without art?); two, while the most frequently visited art galleries (those in Chelsea) are occupied by and crammed with mawkish, tepid pieces of trash, where is there room for the work of actual artists: people who create masterful compositions that represent or reflect upon the beauty of life, or provide for the sorrowful soul a spiritual antidote for the emptiness of existence? Why should these rhapsodic treasures be eclipsed by unskilled mockeries in the name of social status—a concept against which real art rallies?

They try too hard: they tag terrible graffiti before first learning to properly use a spray can (Williamsburg, a neighborhood once known for its skilled street art, is now lacerated with egregious graffiti); hipsters seem to think that, by simply writing their name awkwardly across an iron storefront safeguard, they will instantly be granted with the artistic legacy of Banksy, of Basquiat. No.

Hipsters don’t only infect and erode the value of art, but that of the social sciences too. Political concepts such as socialism are thrown around the hipster community like Lindsay Lohan is thrown around the mainstream media: not fully understood and directly exploited. I once attended a party thrown by students of the New School (an academic institution largely inhabited by hipsters). From the moment I walked through the door, I received dirty looks and snarls from the people present; yet I noticed something about these individuals that seemed to stand in direct contradiction to their unnecessarily misanthropic attitudes: almost all of them had tattoos of or wore clothing that displayed the red star. 

“I’m a socialist,” one of them said to me. “What are you?”

“I don’t label myself by any political ideology,” I replied.

“Typical of the capitalist swine,” he said, sipping his cranberry vodka. “You’re saying exactly what the Bourgeoisie said to Marx when he asked them where they stood on the sociological spectrum.”

“Really?” I said, somewhat amused. “But what did the Bolsheviks say when they were asked the same question in Lennin’s April Theses?”

“I couldn’t care less,” he said, turning to walk away. “I don’t listen to John Lennon.”

—H.H.H.

May 6, 2013
#culture corner #tom salvanti #hipsters #gentrification #subculture #williamsburg #go home
Currently Eating

Yellow Bananas for Everyone

image

Okay, guys, I know it’s not the most imaginative foodstuff in the world, but bear with me. Bananas are totally awesome. Besides being a delicious and portable snack for your college kid on the go, it’s also extremely healthy, boasting 602mg of potassium while limiting your calorie intake to a more than reasonable 140 (this is for your large nine-inch banana). The banana rounds itself out with 2mg of sodium, 2 grams of protein, 4 grams of fiber, and a whole host of vitamins/minerals to keep you alert in class, and enduring in your studies throughout the night. However let me introduce to you my reasons for loving the banana, and hold it in high esteem as one of the best fruits out there.

Number 1: It’s yellow.

C’mon, guys. This one is really obvious. Can you name something that’s totally awesome but isn’t yellow? (Maybe you can.) But let’s pretend I didn’t say hear you say otherwise and list all the awesome things that are also yellow.

A.     The Sun

 

B.     Homer Simpson

 

C.     Orange Juice (weird, I know)

 

D.    Pikachu

 

E.     Spongebob SquarePants

 

Can you come up with a better list than that? No? I didn’t think so. Let’s move on.

Number 2:  They’re always sold in bunches.

You can see from the picture above that, if nothing else, the bananas are very invested in the family unit. If one banana has to go, the whole family goes. I respect this about the banana. Though there are fruits such as grapes that are sold in a similar fashion, it should be noted that grapes aren’t yellow. Anyway, sometimes the banana’s family bond is so strong that it takes herculean strength to rip just one banana away from that thick stem at the top whereby all the other bananas are attached (and sometimes, even more so to actually peel the banana skin). Now, despite how hard the banana may try to keep the family together, there are evildoers out there that try to break the family apart by selling the bananas individually (I’m looking at you, Boylan café). I salute you, Banana. And though you may be the first thing I eat tomorrow morning, I do so with a heavy heart.

 

Number 3: Fruit Salad!

 

Seriously speaking, bananas are a great fruit to eat. The banana is a delicious fruit packed with vitamins and minerals that the body needs to keep moving and healthy. However, bananas are only one of a whole bunch a fruits out there. As great as bananas are, it’s important to take in a variety of fruits. To my knowledge there doesn’t exist that one all powerful super fruit that deems all other fruits useless. Some fruits do things better than others, but variety is key to receive the maximum number of benefits. Vegetables are great as well. The synergy that all these food stuffs create together is greater than anything you could get eating one type of fruit alone.

-Shayne McGregor

 

Source: http://www.banana.com/nutritional.html

Video source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB4MNu6W9sg

           

May 6, 2013
#shayne mcgregor #currently eating #bananas
Intern Magic Hat

Readers Beware: Intern Magic Hat is a space for your devoted English Majors’ Office Interns to strut their stuff with a little taste of their personal passions, talents and on the rare occasion, a bursting impulse to dance.  But it’s really rare. Scout’s honor.

Stop

image

“Hey, you — You actually left your house to see me!”

“Just needed to get some air; don’t feel special.”

“Don’t worry, you are very good at making me not feel special.”

“Oooh, burn!”

I laugh. You smile.

We talk

fast

easy

back and forth

familiar rhythm

I’m sure we look adorable

we always look adorable

bickering

that old married couple vibe

we give off

as a pair of 20-somethings

striding through the park

No one would ever guess

that you’re killing me

and I’m killing you

I match you insult for insult

smile for smile

and you do the same

stuck in this loop

eviscerating each other

with our laughing smiles

our barbed jokes

I hit every one of your weak spots

You hit every one of mine

And still, we laugh

and still, we smile

because it’s all we know

because we’re both too proud to say

Stop.

I care.

You matter.

That hurts.

Stop.

Stop.

Stop.

—-Sarah Meira Rosenberg

Image source: http://vixra.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/stop1.png

May 6, 2013
#intern magic hat #friendship #relationships #love #snark #sarcasm #poetry #Sarah Meira Rosenberg

April 2013

28 posts

news briefs

The Role of the Others

image

Once the association between Tamerlan Tsarneav and terrorist tightened in the eyes of most Americans—researchers, reporters and analysts are now examining the potential conditions of the young man’s life that might have compelled him to commit such an irrational attack.

Tsarneav’s birth in 1986 seemed to signify the climactic point that would soon slide the family’s prosperity and wellbeing into a financial and social perdition.  Citizens of the Soviet Union, they were plighted by the superpower’s political dissolution and abject economic crisis of the 1990s. The Tsarneavs subsequently crossed the border into Kyrgyzstan, but were soon banished by the Russian military invasion in 1999.

The family was granted political asylum by the United States in 2002, but to no conspicuous avail: Tsarneav’s father had been reduced from his position as a prominent attorney in Moscow to an automobile repairman in a back alley of Boston; his mother had been brought up on federal charges for shoplifting and grand larceny; and Tsarnav’s dreams of becoming a world champion boxer would soon derail.

According to his former high school classmates, he had a fervid aspiration for sport fighting and marveled at the thought of one day participating in the Olympics. A quick rise in the ranks and a victory at the 2009 Golden Gloves tournament seemed like stepping stones toward his goal, till a sour encounter with an opponent severed the possibility. Before a fight one night, Tsarneav allegedly entered his counterpart’s dressing room and said something like, “You’re nothing; I’m taking you down.” But the threat didn’t affect Tsarneav’s opponent as forcefully as it infuriated his coach, who subsequently filed a complaint with the competition’s policy board and lobbied, furthermore, to implement a new rule barring all noncitizens (including legal immigrants) from any Golden Glove tournament.

Tsarneav would later attribute his withdrawal from boxing to his growing devotion to Islam; but from where did this “growing devotion” emerge? A mother held in custody, a father trapped at work, continuous political problems from numerous nations, and alienation from peers (since Massachusetts is not the most tolerant of states), how is it surprising that he sought solace in radical Islam? Who should he have turned to? The Americans who used, not his boisterous behavior, but his immigrant status as a means to disqualify him from the only sublimate outlet he had left?

Do these experiences justify or excuse Tsarneav’s decision (whether he was aware of it or not) to detonate a bomb that would kill three and maim three hundred innocent people? Hell no. But to imply (or directly state, as many news/media outlets have done) that the attack was promulgated solely by the inherent evil of another seems almost as irrational as the attack itself. It seems crucial, in the wake of violent monstrosities such as the Boston bombings, not to hoist absolute blame on the perpetrator’s nature, but instead to consider the interaction between who he was and what he saw. The tyrannical, oligarchic initiatives of Russian officials; the moderate indifference of the American legislature; the xenophobic tactics of the coach—these people, these conditions, also played a part.

—Tom Salvanti

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/us/shot-at-boxing-title-denied-tamerlan-tsarnaev-reeled.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Russell Westbrook’s impact on the NBA Playoffs 

image

Oklahoma City Thunder fans were crestfallen a few days ago when they realized that their team’s all star point guard, Russell Westbrook, tore the meniscus in his knee in game two against the Houston Rockets. What does this mean for the playoff series as a whole? Not much most probably. The Rockets are having point guard problems of their own with the health of Jeremy Lin becoming a concern. I thought with the shift in venue, from the Chesapeake Energy Arena to the Toyota Center, combined with rejuvenated spirit in part thanks to the excited Rocket fans, the Rockets could possibly win a game or two. I was wrong considering what transpired Saturday night. This series will be over in four games.

The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Houston Rockets in game three of the series. Durant scored a career playoff high 41 points (though it was on 30 shots), and it looked for stretches in the first half that the Thunder were going to win this game running away. Well that’s why you play four quarters and not two. The Rockets made a comeback helped along by the Thunder’s 20% shooting in the third quarter. Durant hit his usual big shots in the fourth to seal the game. Though you could clearly tell he was fatigued from having to control ball handling responsibilities, initiating the offense, and through it all finding time to get his own shot. Overall I think the Thunder still pull through. Kevin Durant is still the best player in the series, and in the NBA where five players from each respective team take the floor, one player can make all the difference. The Thunder also have the better supporting cast, players surrounding Kevin Durant, like Serge Ibaka, Kendrick Perkins, and Kevin Martin. Though these players didn’t have spectacular games on Saturday night, they will have to step their level of play up to make up the loss of Russell Westbrook. I believe they will. The Rockets just can’t match up with the Thunder talent wise.

Which team represents the Western Conference in the NBA finals is the bigger, and more prevalent, question as far as I’m concerned. With the injury to Russell Westbrook, the doorway to the holy grail of basketball, that was previously ajar, is now wide open. What does this mean for a team like the San Antonio Spurs? With Westbrook sitting on the sidelines I can see the Spurs making a push. They match up pretty well. In a game, the Thunder may have to over compensate to defend the guards of the opposing Spurs, namely Tony Parker, and in doing so that gives openings in the defense for Manu Ginobli and the Big Fundamental, Tim Duncan. The same goes for the Clippers and Grizzles. Only one of them will play the Thunder obviously since they each are playing the other currently in round one. In a matchup however, both the Grizzles and Clippers have great point guard play. Mike Conley, Grizzles Point Guard, and Chris Paul, Clippers point Guard, are known for their exceptional defense and creative passing ability. Chris Paul in particular was in the MVP race this season.

I’m a huge Knick fan. I see this as a great opportunity for my favorite team. Yea, they play in the Eastern Conference, and they wouldn’t play the Thunder until the NBA finals, but their only real competition in that conference is the Miami Heat (A team which the Knicks beat three out of four meetings this season). If the Knicks can get pass the Heat, I’d feel pretty confident going into the NBA finals, and their chances against whichever team comes out the West. 

—Shayne McGregor   

Sources:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/27/sports/basketball/russell-westbrooks-injury-a-blow-to-oklahoma-city-thunder.html?ref=basketball

http://nba.si.com/2013/04/28/thunder-rockets-game-3-russell-westbrook-injury-durant-reggie-jackson/

Apr 29, 2013
#news briefs #tom salvanti #tamerlan tsarneav #boston bombings #hate #intolerance #shane mcgregor #knicks #thunder
Currently Reading


image

The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

Anne Bronte

 

Anne Bronte’s The Tenant of Wildfell Hall had been sitting, rather neglected, on my shelf for a year before I opened it a few weeks ago. I was raised on the Brontes, taking long walks in the rain, imagining I was somewhere in the heather blanketed English moors. But despite my love for the 19th century novel, this book had escaped my attention until recently. 

Written in the form of a letter, it tells the story of Helen Graham, a mysterious woman, who takes up residence in a rambling and dilapidated old manor in the English countryside. Here, she lives alone with her young son, working as an artist to support herself. Reserved but outspoken, Helen makes precious few friends, one of whom is Gilbert Markham, a respectable, and occasionally, impetuous young farmer. As the novel progresses, these two characters form a strong attachment, which is threatened by poisonous rumors surrounding the history and true identity of Mrs. Graham. 

The Tenant of Wildfell Hall has been acknowledged as one of the earliest feminist novels. Like her sister’s acclaimed works, Anne Bronte incorporates a strong female character, but unlike the characters of other Bronte novels, Helen is more believable. She is not a romantic heroine like Jane Eyre or a wild child like Catherine Earnshaw. There are no madwomen in the attic or spurned lovers on injurious quests of obsessive revenge. Helen Graham is much more ordinary. She is single mother in search of peace from a hellish past, while trying to support and raise her son without the assistance of his father. 

This is one of the truest stories I have ever read, and surprisingly, one of the most progressive. It challenges gender issues, rules, and stereotypes. I believe that anyone could relate to this story and to its heroine. Just be prepared to not be able to get up from the couch for several hours.   

—-Areilla Shapiro

  

Image Source:http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xq8hFhZBF2c/TpvnhFt6BlI/AAAAAAAAATs/AVVD3it5EsU/s1600/The+Tenant+of+Wildfell+Hall-inside+cover.jpg

Apr 29, 20131 note
#Currently Reading #The Tenant of Wildfell Hall #Anne Bronte #Ariella Shapiro
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January
  • February 34
  • March 36
  • April 28
  • May 18
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 11
  • February 43
  • March 48
  • April 46
  • May 34
  • June 6
  • July
  • August 3
  • September 43
  • October 52
  • November 27
  • December 28
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September 4
  • October 1
  • November 38
  • December 42